Harald Zandler,
Andreas Kellerer-Pirklbauer,
University of Graz, Department of Geography and Regional Science, Austria
DOI:
UDC: 551.343.4-047.36:551.345(436)
Published: August 2026
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Keywords: Permafrost, rock glacier velocity, UAV, climate change, Alps
Abstract
Changes in mountain permafrost are of major scientific and societal interest due to associated potential risks to mountain communities. Rock glaciers, which are slowly creeping debris-ice landforms typical of mountainous permafrost regions, are key indicators of permafrost dynamics. Their movement serves as a critical parameter for the Essential Climate Variable (ECV) permafrost. This study investigates the movement of two rock glaciers in the Hohe Tauern Mountain Range, Austria: Tschadinhorn rock glacier (TRG) and Leibnitzkopf rock glacier (LRG), during 2023–2024 and compares derived movement rates to previous rock glacier velocity studies of these sites, as well as to ground and air temperature records. For rock glacier velocity quantification, we used unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) with real-time-kinematic capabilities to create geodatasets of high spatial resolution and accuracy for both years. Rock glacier movement patterns were calculated using orthoimages, aligned to an existing geodetic network, using a state-of-the-art image correlation algorithm (GeoCosiCorr3D).
Results show that TRG exhibited the highest published, photogrammetrically derived mean RGV to date, 3.8 m/year in 2023–2024, exceeding previous maxima of interpolated point measurements reported for 2014–2015 and photogrammetric data from 2015–2016. At LRG, the maximum velocity reached 6.2 m/year, surpassing the previously published maximum of 5.8 m/year, but with a spatial shift in the location of peak movement. Spatial patterns at LRG indicate deceleration within central sectors and acceleration at the frontal zone, whereas TRG shows a more uniform acceleration. The climate context supports these trends: long-term, regional station data registered an all-time annual temperature record in 2024, consistent with a positive temperature-RGV relationship. However, local ground and air temperature observations since 2018 reveal site-specific responses with no clear trends, but a tendency of higher movement rates in warmer years at TRG and no simple, uniform linkage at LRG, suggesting modulation by internal kinematics and spatial heterogeneities.
Our findings provide robust, spatially resolved velocity evaluations for two representative alpine rock glaciers in the Alps and demonstrate recent acceleration consistent with long-term ongoing warming. The results underscore the need for sustained, multi-sensor monitoring to disentangle climatic forcing from internal deformation processes, thereby improving process understanding and risk assessment in high-mountain permafrost environments.
References:
L. Schrott, R. Bell, & J. H. Blöthe, “Mountain hazards and permafrost degradation,” in Safeguarding Mountain Social-Ecological Systems, Elsevier, 2024, pp. 31–41. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822095-5.00005-X.
Y. Hu et al., “Rock Glacier Velocity: An Essential Climate Variable Quantity for Permafrost,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 63, no. 1, p. e2024RG000847, 2025, doi: 10.1029/2024RG000847.
S. Piccinelli & N. Cannone, “Divergent Responses of Alpine Rock Glaciers to Climate Change: A Review of Ecological and Abiotic Dynamics,” Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 438–450, 2025, doi: 10.1002/ppp.2278.
A. Kellerer-Pirklbauer et al., “Acceleration and interannual variability of creep rates in mountain permafrost landforms (rock glacier velocities) in the European Alps in 1995–2022,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 034022, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad25a4.
RGIK, “Rock Glacier Velocity as an associated parameter of ECV Permafrost: Baseline concepts (Version 3.2),” IPA Action Group Rock glacier inventories and kinematics. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://bigweb.unifr.ch/Science/Geosciences/Geomorphology/Pub/Website/IPA/CurrentVersion/Current_RockGlacierVelocity.pdf
H. Zandler, J. Abermann, B. A. Robson, A. Maschler, T. Scheiber, J. L. Carrivick, & J. C. Yde, “Deep learning outperforms existing algorithms in glacier surface velocity estimation with high-resolution data – the example of Austerdalsbreen, Norway,” Front. Remote Sens., vol. 6, May 2025, doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1586933.
C. Fey & K. Krainer, “Analyses of UAV and GNSS based flow velocity variations of the rock glacier Lazaun (Ötztal Alps, South Tyrol, Italy),” Geomorphology, vol. 365, p. 107261, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107261.
V. Kaufmann, W. Sulzer, G. Seier, & M. Wecht, “Panta Rhei: Movement Change of Tschadinhorn Rock Glacier (Hohe Tauern Range, Austria), 1954–2017 https://doi.org/10.32909/kg.18.31.1,” Kartografija i geoinformacije (Cartography and Geoinformation), vol. 18, no. 31, Art. no. 31, Apr. 2019, Accessed: Oct. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://kig.kartografija.hr/index.php/kig/article/view/854
V. Kaufmann, G. Seier, W. Sulzer, M. Wecht, Q. Liu, G. Lauk, & M. Maurer, “Rock glacier monitoring using aerial photographs: conventional vs. UAV-based mapping – a comparative study,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. XLII–1, pp. 239–246, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-239-2018.
V. Kaufmann, A. Kellerer-Pirklbauer, & G. Seier, “Conventional and UAV-Based Aerial Surveys for Long-Term Monitoring (1954–2020) of a Highly Active Rock Glacier in Austria,” Front. Remote Sens., vol. 2, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3389/frsen.2021.732744.
Land Kärnten, “Digitales 10m – Geländemodell aus Airborne Laserscan Daten der Österreichischen Länder.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.data.gv.at/katalog/en/dataset/land-ktn_digitales-gelandemodell-dgm-osterreich#resources
Emlid, “Emlid Studio,” Emlid. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2026. [Online].
Available: https://docs.emlid.com/emlid-studio/
Emlid, “Reach RS3,” Emlid. Accessed: Jan. 22, 2025. [Online].
Available: https://emlid.com/reachrs3/
Agisoft, “Agisoft Metashape Professional V 2.3.” [Online].
Available: https://www.agisoft.com/downloads
S. Aati, C. Milliner, & J.-P. Avouac, “A new approach for 2-D and 3-D precise measurements of ground deformation from optimized registration and correlation of optical images and ICA-based filtering of image geometry artifacts,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 277, p. 113038, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113038.
S. Aati, Geospatial-COSICorr3D GitHub page. (Dec. 31, 2024). Python. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/SaifAati/Geospatial-COSICorr3D
S. Leprince, S. Barbot, F. Ayoub, & J.-P. Avouac, “Automatic and Precise Orthorectification, Coregistration, and Subpixel Correlation of Satellite Images, Application to Ground Deformation Measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1529–1558, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.888937.
S. D. Jawak, S. Kumar, A. J. Luis, M. Bartanwala, S. Tummala, & A. C. Pandey, “Evaluation of Geospatial Tools for Generating Accurate Glacier Velocity Maps from Optical Remote Sensing Data,” in The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Remote Sensing, MDPI, Mar. 2018, p. 341. doi: 10.3390/ecrs-2-05154.
H. Zandler, W. Sulzer, & V. Kaufmann, “Delineation of debris-covered glaciers with multi-temporal UAV images (Gössnitzkees, Schober Group/Austria),” Advances in Geodesy and Geoinformation, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. e66, 1–17, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.24425/agg.2025.154150.
P. Kraaijenbrink, S. W. Meijer, J. M. Shea, F. Pellicciotti, S. M. De Jong, & W. W. Immerzeel, “Seasonal surface velocities of a Himalayan glacier derived by automated correlation of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery,” Ann. Glaciol., vol. 57, no. 71, pp. 103–113, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.3189/2016AoG71A072.
F. Paul et al., “Error sources and guidelines for quality assessment of glacier area, elevation change, and velocity products derived from satellite data in the Glaciers_cci project,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 203, pp. 256–275, Dec. 2017,
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.038.
B. Staub, A. Hasler, J. Noetzli, & R. Delaloye, “Gap-Filling Algorithm for Ground Surface Temperature Data Measured in Permafrost and Periglacial Environments: Gap-Filling Algorithm for GST Data Measured in Permafrost Environments,” Permafrost and Periglac. Process., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 275–285, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1002/ppp.1913.
I. Auer et al., “HISTALP—historical instrumental climatological surface time series of the Greater Alpine Region,” Intl Journal of Climatology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–46, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1002/joc.1377.
S. S. David A Swayne & C. Obimbo, “Automating the Smoothing of Time Series Data,” J Environ Anal Toxicol, vol. 05, no. 05, 2015, doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000304.
L. Cheng, G. Foster, Z. Hausfather, K. E. Trenberth, & J. Abraham, “Improved Quantification of the Rate of Ocean Warming,” Journal of Climate, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 4827–4840, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0895.1.
S. A. Khan, H. Zandler, & O. Sass, “Climate change impacts on livelihoods in the Eastern Hindu Kush: integrating local perceptions and biophysical data,” Reg Environ Change, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 114, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10113-025-02414-9.
I. Haag, P. D. Jones, & C. Samimi, “Central Asia’s Changing Climate: How Temperature and Precipitation Have Changed across Time, Space, and Altitude,” Climate, vol. 7, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/cli7100123.
V. Kaufmann, “Website for access to geodetic measurement results of Leibnitzkopf rock glacier.” 2025. [Online]. Available:
https://www.staff.tugraz.at/viktor.kaufmann/Leibnitzkopf_Rock_Glacier/index.html
V. Kaufmann, “Website for access to geodetic measurement results of Tschadinhorn rock glacier.” 2025. [Online]. Available:
https://www.staff.tugraz.at/viktor.kaufmann/Tschadinhorn_Rock_Glacier/index.html