Andreas Koch
Department of Sociology and Social Geography, University of Salzburg, Austria
DOI:
UDC: 338.48-6:63(496.5)
Published: August 2026
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Keywords: decommodification, decentralization, deterritorialization, municipalism, commons
Abstract:
This article develops a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding place-based rural development as a strategy to counteract the structural forces of commodification, centralization, and territorialization that shape contemporary socio-ecological crises. It argues that rural marginalization is not a natural condition but the outcome of political-economic and discursive processes that privilege urban growth models while systematically devaluing local specificities. In response, the paper proposes a strategic triad—decentralization, decommodification, and relational spatial concepts—as the normative and analytical foundation for strengthening rural communities. Places are conceptualized not as static containers but as relational, material, and discursive assemblages that can function as resources for emancipatory practice, participation, and collective empowerment. Commons are introduced as an exemplary institutional form through which local communities can partially detach essential goods and services from market logics while expanding democratic self-governance.
References:
Blühdorn, I. Nachhaltige Nicht-Nachhaltigkeit [Sustainable Non-Sustainability]. Bielefeld, 2020.
Koch, A. Orte als Ressource emanzipatorischer sozialräumlicher Praktiken [Places as a Resource for Empowering Social-Spatial Practices]. Sozialwissenschaftliche Rundschau, No. 64, vol. 2/2024, pp 160-176, 2024.
Koch, A. Ein kritischer Blick auf Commons zur Bekämpfung und Prävention von Armut [A Critical View on Commons as an Approach to Combat and Prevent Poverty]. Leßmann, O, Marquardsen, K. (eds.): Armut erforschen: Akteursperspektive, strukturelle Bedingungen und politische Implikationen. Duisburg, pp 257-264, 2025.
Lessenich, S. Grenzen der Demokratie [Limits to Democracy], Ditzingen, 2019.
Pistor, K. The Code of Capital, Princeton, 2019.
Castells, M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge, 2015.
Beck, U. & Poferl, A. Einleitung [Introduction]. Beck, U., Poferl, A. (eds.): Große Armut, großer Reichtum. Zur Transnationalisierung sozialer Ungleichheit. Berlin, pp 9-22, 2010.
Brand, U. & Schickert, C. Ökosozialistische Strategien für eine sozial-ökologische Transformation [Eco-Social Strategies for a Social-Ecological Transformation]. Dörre, K. & Schickert, C. (eds.): Neosozialismus, München, pp165-183, 2019.
Willett, J. & Williams, M. & Akerman, L. & Rawlinson, H. & Ghezal, A. & Pitts, F. H. Peripheralization and economic development: a multi-causal approach. European Planning Studies, vol. 33, Issue 4, pp 471-490, 2025.
Ostrom, E. Jenseits von Markt und Staat [Beyond Market and State], Ditzingen, 2022.
Massey, D. For Space, London, 2005.
Jones, M. Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography 33(4), pp 487-506, 2009.
Rau, S. Räume [Spaces]. Frankfurt a.M., 2013.
Helfrich, S. & Bollier, D. Commons – Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat [Commons – A New Policy beyond Market and State], Bielefeld, 2009.
Bookchin, M. Die nächste Revolution [The Next Revolution], Münster, 2020.
Çiço, O. & Krasniqi, Y. Agritourism in Albania – Overview and Need for Support. International Scientific Journal Monte, vol. 4, No. 2, pp 107-112, 2021.
Mulita, R. & Sefa, B. Agritourism management in sustainable rural development and cultural heritage preservation. Economics Ecology Socium, vol. 9, Issue 1, pp 65-76, 2025.
Koch, A. Introducing Structural Peripheries in the European Union. Ballinger, P. & Sedmak, C. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Peripheries in European Studies, London and New York, pp 217-232, 2026.
Streifeneder, T. Agriculture first: Assessing European policies and scientific typologies to define authentic agritourism and differentiate it from countryside tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives No. 20, pp 251-264, 2016.
UN World Tourism Organization. Tourism and Rural Development: A Policy Perspective. New York, 2023.
Przezbórska-Skobiej, L. & Ryś-Jurek, R. Revenues from Agritourism and their Determinants for the European Farms. European Research Studies Journal, vol. XXVII, Issue 4, pp 905-920, 2024.
Bacsi, Z. & Szálteleki, P. Farm Profitability and Agritourism in the EU – Does Size Matter? Deturope, vol. 14, Issue 2, pp 152-171, 2022.
Koutsouris, A. & Gidarakou, I. & Grava, F. & Michailidis, A. The phantom of (agri)tourism and agriculture symbiosis? A Greek case study. Tourism Management Perspectives, vol. 12, pp 94-103, 2014.
Sulaj, A. & Themelko, H. Agritourism as a Pathway to Women’s Empowerment: Insights from Rural Albania. European Countryside, vol. 16, No. 4, pp 628-646, 2024.
Albinfo.ch. Rabdisht village belongs to the 100 tourist villages of Albania. https://www.albinfo.ch/de/das-albanische-dorf-im-rennen-um-den-titel-beste-touristische-doerfer-der-welt/ [2026-02-09], 2026.
Kulla Hupi. The Guest House’s Website. https://kullahupi.al/about-kulla-hupi/ [2026-02-09], 2026.
Mrizi i Zanave. The Guest House’s Website https://www.mrizizanave.al [2026-02-09], 2026.
United Nations Albania. Albania: investing in agritourism as an engine for shared prosperity. https://albania.un.org/en/264242-albania-investing-agritourism-engine-shared-prosperity [2026-02-09], 2026.